Showing posts with label Europe. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Europe. Show all posts

Saturday, February 29, 2020


Comparative geography of local languages ​​in Europe and America: differentiation, standardization and political recognition 
First Part
Danilo Anton

1. Introduction
 The historical evolution of traditional societies that possessed community structures and modes of self-sustainable production and consumption led to the formation of differentiated local cultures. Although there was an exchange with neighboring communities due to their relative isolation, particular linguistic characteristics were developed, different from the neighboring languages. These idiomatic or dialect variations, which could sometimes be very important, acted as the defining axis of these cultures.
As the states developed, with more or less centralized administration, the need to adopt one or more common languages ​​was generated. In some cases, lingua franca developed as was the case with Swahili in East Africa and Tuscan in Italy.
In other cases the language that was imposed belonged to the strongest region (culturally, economically and / or politically), as was the case of Spanish in Spain, English in the British Isles and Mandarin in China, or the colonial power dominant (English in India, French in northwestern African countries, Russian in the Russian Federation).
As new states became established and independent during the 19th and 20th centuries, the national languages ​​were consolidated. This phenomenon occurred mainly in the European continent and in Asia, and to a lesser extent in Africa.
In the American continent there was a different process. Due to the invasion and occupation of the native territories the local cultures were partially or totally substituted eliminating or weakening the indigenous languages. A similar situation occurred in Australia and New Zealand.
In these regions, no national state was established based on native cultures. All states arose from former foreign colonies (Spanish, English, Portuguese, French) that gained independence during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries.
In the following paragraphs we will analyze the comparative linguistic ethnogeography of Europe and America with some references to the rest of the world that we consider relevant to the subject considered.

2. Linguistic differentiation in Europe and the political recognition of local languages
In Europe, this evolution throughout history led to the formation of several hundred different languages ​​or local dialects.
The expansion of some states (Greek-Macedonian and Roman Empires) in the so-called classical era (5th century BC to 6th century AD) and Greek-Byzantine gave rise to linguistic homogenization due to the imposition of certain strong languages ​​on weaker ones.
In particular, Latin (in Western Europe and the western half of the Mediterranean Sea) and Greek (in the eastern half of the Mediterranean Sea) were expanded.
From the fall of the Roman Empire of the West, in the fifth century, linguistic differentiation intensified. Thus, after several centuries of transformation, local languages, strongly influenced by written, bureaucratic and religious Latin gave rise to several linguistic varieties generally called "Romance languages" in the former provinces of the Empire. In the Iberian Peninsula the Galician-Portuguese language, Spanish, Catalan, Asturian, Leonese and others were developed. In the Italian peninsula and neighboring islands, the Tuscan language, Piedmontese, Lombard, Veneto, Sardinian, Corsican, Calabrian, Sicilian, etc. evolved. In the ancient transalpine galias these processes gave rise to the Provencal language, Occitan, French, Romansh, Walloon and others. In Dacia the Romanian emerged. In North Africa the influence was less due to the strong Phoenician roots and pre-existing Berbers. The Afro-Romance languages ​​that emerged are extinguished in the early medieval period as well as in the British Isles a British Romance language became extinct in the early Middle Ages.
In the Greco-speaking area the local differentiation was minor due to the longer duration of the Greco-Byzantine domination and the Ottoman invasion in Anatolia that imposed the Turkish languages ​​replacing Greek in the main centers of the former Byzantine Empire.
In the European regions that did not experience Roman or Greco-Byzantine domination, families with different ethno-linguistic roots were developed (German-Scandinavian, Slavic, Finnish, Magyar, Albanian, Celtic and Euzkaro languages, among others).
At the beginning of the 20th century, 150 different languages ​​were spoken in Europe, including numerous dialect varieties. Among them there were about 60 languages ​​with sufficient demographic volume and local predominance to transcend politically and culturally.
In fact, 41 languages ​​became dominant official languages ​​(national languages) in their respective states. The process of defense and officialization of national languages ​​proved complex and it was necessary to resist the cultural and political domination of dominant (sometimes occupying) states. Some languages ​​survived but did not become dominant official languages ​​(eg Basque, Catalan, Breton, Welsh, Corsican, Sardinian, Sami, Tatar, Chechen).
Many of the new states emerged as a result of the dissolution of the Soviet Union. This is the case of Ukrainian, Belarusian, Moldovan, Lithuanian, Latvian, Estonian, Armenian, Georgian and Azeri. Something similar happened as a result of the break-up of Yugoslavia that resulted in the establishment of independent states with their own national languages ​​(Slovenian, Serbo-Croatian, Bosnia-Herzegovina, Montenegrin, Macedonian, Albanian languages ​​of Kosovo, etc.).
In any case, after this long evolutionary history, the resulting official ethno-linguistic geography in Europe is one of the most diverse in the world (see Tables 1 and 2).
The multiple historical episodes that marked European political evolution led to the formation of numerous national states that, in most cases, managed to preserve their own languages.
Because of this, many local languages, now recognized as national languages, have social prestige and state support, in particular educational and economic.
Table 1 shows the 49 European states with their respective dominant and secondary languages, including the approximate number of speakers of each of them.guage

1.              Andorra Catalán 50,000
2.              Armenia Armenian3,200,000
3.              Azerbaijan Azeri 8,500,000
4.              Austria German 8,000,000
5.              Belgium   Flemish  6,100,000
6.              Walloon (French) 600,000
7.              Belarus Belarusian 7,000,000
8.              Bulgaria Bulgarian 7,000,000
9.              Croatia  Coatian (Serbo-Croatian) 4,000,000
10.          Denmark Danish 5,500,000
11.          Slovakia Slovakia 5,000,000
12.          Slovenia Slovenian 1,900,000
13.          Spain  Spanish 44,000,000
14.          Estonia  Estonian 920,000
15.          Finland  Finnish 5,000,000
16.          France French 65,000,000
17.          Georgia Georgian 4,000,000
18.          Greece Greek 11,000,000
19.          Netherlands Dutch 20,000,000
20.          Hungary Hungarian 9,000,000I
21.          Ireland English 6,000,000 Irish 3,000,000
22.          Iceland  Icelandic  300,000
23.          Italy Italian 60,000,000
24.          Latvia Latvian 1,400,000
25.          Lithuania Lithuanian 3,000,000
26.          Luxembourg Luxembourgish 350,000
27.          Macedonia Macedonian 1,800,000
28.          Malta   Maltese 330,000
29.          Moldova Moldovan (Romanian) 3,200,000
30.          Montenegro Serbo-Croatian 300,000 Montenegrin 200,000
31.          Norway Norwegian 4,500,000
32.          Poland Polish 38,000,000
33.          Portugal Portuguese 11,000,000
34.          United Kingdom English 61,000,000
35.          Czech Republic Czech 10,000,000
36.          Romania    Romanian 20,000,000
37.          Russia    Russian 142,000,000
38.          Serbia Serbian (Serbo-Croatian) 7,000,000
39.          Sweden  Swedish 9,000,000
40.          Ukraine Ukrainian 37,000,000

To be continued

Thursday, February 14, 2019


´Discrimination to Roma people in Europe (Gypsies)

The Roma make up the largest and most vulnerable minority group in Eastern Europe. Although exact population estimates vary, Bulgaria, Hungary, Romania, and Slovakia have the highest shares of Roma within the overall population in the entire European Union. Roma communities are subject to considerable economic vulnerability, reflecting a complex set of interrelated challenges. In Eastern Europe, for example, 71% or more of Roma households live in deep poverty. Although many of these families reside in highly developed countries they nonetheless have to cope with levels of poverty and deprivation on par with the poorest areas of the world, and face bleak economic prospects due to persistent unemployment and low levels of education. The gap between a Roma family and an average European family broadens every day.
In all Roma households, household members suffer from hunger. The odds of graduating secondary school are 29 percent at the highest, and much lower in some of the countries in the region, especially among girls. In addition, less than half of all Roma men and a quarter or less of all Roma women can find jobs. At the root of these unequal outcomes lies a fundamentally unfair playing field, starting at birth and continuing throughout the lives of most Roma individuals. This spurs a self-perpetuating cycle of unequal opportunities, ethnic discrimination and stifled aspirations.
Addressing these deep inequalities for the Roma is a key human rights issue, but also a smart economic strategy for the countries concerned: with the rapidly aging populations in Eastern Europe, up to 10-20 percent of new labor market entrants in these countries are young Roma. Getting this group into jobs would increase national GDP levels as well as government revenues substantially.
Reference.
http://www.worldbank.org/en/region/eca/brief/roma

Sunday, April 16, 2017

The slave trade in America



The paradigms of European "democracy" that are cited as examples of political development were societies that depended on the slave labor force for almost all their products and services. It is noted that at the height of the boom in Athens, free citizens constituted less than 20,000 men. If we added their families to them, they did not exceed 90,000 people at any time. At that time there were 365,000 slaves and 45,000 meteques (immigrants and freedmen). As Engels points out "For every adult citizen there were at least eighteen slaves and more than two Metecs." Other figures commonly given to the cities of classical Greece include more than 460,000 slaves in Corinth and 470,000 in Aegina.
Slavery continued to be the basis of economies and societies in Europe and the Middle East after the geopolitical decline of Greek cities. The Roman Empire was built and maintained by the work of millions of slaves. In the so-called European Middle Ages, slavery and servitude (in many respects similar to slavery) were the fundamental institutions maintained by territorial and religious aristocracies. The slave trade from Africa was the basis of the "prosperity" of the Moorish kingdoms of the North African Maghreb. Later, a century before the arrival of the first Spanish ships to America, tens of thousands of Guanches, aboriginal inhabitants of the Canary Islands were taken prisoner to be sold as slaves to work in the cane plantations of the island (Portuguese) Of wood.
For that reason it seemed logical that since the first contacts of the Spanish and Portuguese with the communities of America have captured a certain number of slaves to be sold in the markets of the Iberian peninsula.
Nor is it any wonder that in establishing the first European colonies in America, markets for slaves have also been created. This fact, which in Europe would have been banal, in America, where slavery was practically unknown, gave rise to the unleashing of totally new processes for the continent. The dominant local groups made captives much more than before, but now in order to sell them or pay taxes to newcomers.
In this way, slave capture and commercialization systems appeared in several places in North America, among the Guarani of the Andean foothills (Chiriguanos Izoceños), near the present city of Santa Cruz, Bolivia, who enslaved the Chane, among the Kadijeu of Mato Grosso that enslaved the Terena, and others..
From Amerrique, los Huérfanos del Paraiso, D.Antón, Piriguazú Edicionmes, 1997