German professor examines massively altered data from NASA GISS temperature data sets
By
P Gosselin on 20. November 2015
Not
long ago retired geologist and data computation expert Professor
Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert began
looking at the data behind the global warming claims, and especially
the datasets of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS).
Ewert
painstakingly examined and tabulated the reams of archived data from
1153 stations that go back to 1881 – which NASA has publicly
available – data that the UN IPCC uses to base its conclusion that
man is heating the Earth’s atmosphere through the burning of fossil
fuels. According to Ederer, what Professor Ewert found is
“unbelievable”:
From
the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery:
Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were
altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after
1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012
shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that
especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it
never existed.”
Veteran journalist, Günter Ederer, who denounced the fraud, wrote that Ewert particularly found alterations at stations in the
Arctic. Professor Ewert randomly selected 120 stations from all over
the world and compared the 2010 archived data to the 2012 data and
found that they had been tampered to produce warming.
The
old data showed regular cycles of warming and cooling over the
period, even as atmospheric CO2 concentration rose from 0.03% to
0.04%. According to the original NASA datasets, Ederer writes, the
mean global temperature cooled from 13.8°C in 1881 to 12.9°C in
1895. Then it rose to 14.3°C by 1905 and fell back under 12.9°C by
1920, rose to 13.9°C by 1930, fell to 13° by 1975 before
rising to 14°C by 2000. By 2010 the temperature fell back to 13.2°C.
But
then came the “massive” altering of data, which also altered the
entire overall trend for the period. According to journalist Ederer,
Ewert uncovered 10 different methods NASA used to alter the data. The
6 most often used methods were:
• Reducing
the annual mean in the early phase.
• Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
• Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
• Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995.
• Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
• With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.
• Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
• Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
• Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995.
• Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
• With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.
The
methods were employed for stations such as Darwin, Australia and
Palma de Mallorca, for example, where cooling trends were suddenly
transformed into warming.
Ewert
then discovered that NASA having altered the datasets once in March
2012 was not enough. Alterations were made again in August 2012, and
yet again in December 2012. For Palma de Majorca: “Now
because of the new datasets it has gotten even warmer. Now they show
a warming of +0.01202°C per year.”
Using
earlier NASA data, globe is in fact cooling
The
veteran German journalist Ederer writes that the media reports of
ongoing global warming are in fact not based on reality at all, but
rather on “the
constantly altered temperatures of the earlier decades.”
Ederer adds:
Thus the issue of man-made global warming has taken on a whole new meaning: Yes, it is always man-made if the data are adjusted to fit the theory. The meticulous work by Ewert has predecessors, and fits a series of scandals and contradictions that are simply being ignored by the political supporters of man-made climate change.”
Ederer
also brings up the analysis by American meteorologists Joseph D’Aleo
and Anthony Watts who examined 6000 NASA measurement stations and
found an abundance of measurement irregularities stemming in large
part from serious siting issues. According to Ederer the findings by
Professor Ewert are in close agreement with those of Watts and
D’Aleo.
Ederer
writes of the overall findings by Professor Ewert:
Using the NASA data from 2010 the surface temperature globally from 1940 until today has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C […]. The cooling has hit every continent except for Australia, which warmed by 0.6339°C since 2000. The figures for Europe: From 1940 to 2010, using the data from 2010, there was a cooling of 0.5465°C and a cooling of 0.3739°C since 2000.”
Ederer
summarizes that in view of the magnitude of the scandal, one would
think that there would be in investigation. Yet he does not believe
this will be the case because the global warming has turned into a
trillion-dollar industry and that that too much is tied to it.
From: http://notrickszone.com
-
See more at:http://notrickszone.com/2015/11/20/german-professor-examines-nasa-giss-temperature-datasets-finds-they-have-been-massively-altered/#sthash.x7xzBq5p.dpbs/2015/11/20/german-professor-examines-nasa-giss-temperature-datasets-finds-they-have-been-massively-altered/#sthash.x7xzBq5p.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment