Showing posts with label Syria. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Syria. Show all posts

Monday, January 6, 2020

Who is more respectful of Christmas celebrations? Iran and Syria, or Saudi Arabia and Israel?
Christmas is a time of goodwill to all men. Or at least it should be. But while the West’s Middle East ‘bad guys’ Iran and Syria, showed the Yuletide spirit (period of several days around and including Christmas day), its closest allies, Saudi Arabia and Israel, failed to do so.
Iran is demonized by Western neocons and we’re meant to see the country as an evil, ‘monster‘ regime of foaming-at-the-mouth religious fanatics who hate everyone.
So it goes against the dominant narrative somewhat that Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tweeted a Christmas message and wished ‘peace and joy to all in 2019’, on Christmas Eve.
From Javad Zarif:
The angels said, "Mary, God gives you good tidings of a Word from Him whose name is Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary; high honored shall he be in this world and the next, near stationed to God. (QURAN 2:45)
May the blessings of the birth of Jesus usher peace and joy to all in 2019.
It also goes against the narrative, that Zarif, back in September, wished Jews, in Iran and across the world, “a very Happy New Year filled with peace and harmony.”
He also wished well to all Jews worldwide:
Iran's Zarif wishes 'happy Rosh Hashana' to Jews worldwide http://dlvr.it/QkLdKd 
We’re told repeatedly that the Iranian ‘regime’ is ‘anti-Semitic’, but do ‘anti-Semites’ wish Jews a happy ‘Rosh Hashanah’? If so, it's a rather strange definition.
The Iranian Foreign Minister also tweeted on December 26 a message of goodwill to Iran’s Zoroastrian community.
In fact, despite the large number of Christians from other countries who work in the country, including many Britons, the holding of any Christmas-related services or commemorations in Saudi Arabia is strictly banned. “The Christmas season – often a season where Christians around the world are most visible – is a tense time for Christians in Saudi Arabia, who have to celebrate the holiday in secret, risking arrest and deportation,” said Jeff King, President of the International Christian Concern, in 2016.
Imagine being a Christian and not being able to openly celebrate the birth of Christ. It happens in Saudi Arabia, yet Western leaders, so keen to lecture others about ‘human rights’ and ‘religious freedom’ stay silent, preferring to pick on Iran – where Christmas can be openly celebrated.
Syria is another country ‘monstered’ by the endless war lobby but where, against all the odds, the Christmas spirit is still maintained. Big seasonal celebrations were held this year in Aleppo and Damascus. Remember Aleppo?
It was recaptured by the Syrian Arab Army from Islamist ‘rebels’ two years ago this month, and the neocon/’liberal interventionist’ commentariat, and most of the political class portrayed it as a most terrible thing. Ian Austin MP said that people in Aleppo faced ‘slaughter’.
John Woodcock MP called the Morning Star newspaper ‘traitorous scum’ for referring to the recapture of Aleppo by Syrian forces of their own territory, as a ‘liberation’. But if you look at the pictures of Christians celebrating Christmas there once again, which they were forbidden to do under the western-backed head-chopping ’rebels’ you can see that the ‘L’ word was indeed appropriate.

Author: Neil Clark

Reference:
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/447671-christmas-iran-syria-israel-saudis/

Tuesday, January 29, 2019


The Kurds threaten the United States in joining the Syrian Government forces
The Syrian Democratic Council is the political wing of the Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF) in the de facto autonomous Democratic Federation of Northern Syria.
The SDF is militarily led by the People's Protection Unites (YPG), a mostly Kurdish militia.[108] Founded in October 2015, the SDF states its mission as fighting to create a secular, democratic and federal Syria.The updated December 2016 constitution of the -Democratic Federation of Northern Syria names the SDF as its official defence force.
A top Syrian Kurdish official visiting Washington today said US-backed fighters would consider integrating with Bashar al-Assad’s forces after the United States completes its pullout from the war-torn country.
“The Syrian Democratic Forces can be part of the new Syrian army,” Ilham Ahmed, a leader in the Syrian Democratic Council (SDC), said through an interpreter at the Middle East Institute today. “This is an alternative path for us.”
The news
Syrian Kurds tell Washington they may join forces with Assad if US pulls out of Syria

Ahmed, who leads the executive council of the SDC, the political wing of the US-backed Syrian Democratic Forces, said the Donald Trump administration had not objected to Syrian Kurds opening up negotiations with Damascus.
“They did not object clearly. They always tell us this is a Syrian affair,” she said. “But they urged us, when you negotiate, you should come from a strong position.”
Even as the United States appears to have slowed down its pullout from Syria, a turn by Kurdish forces toward Damascus could frustrate the Pentagon’s plans to stabilize former Islamic State-held areas.
Speaking to reporters today, acting Defense Secretary Patrick Shanahan indicated that the Pentagon is still on track with plans to integrate US-supported Kurdish forces into towns and cities along the Middle Euphrates River Valley, the one-time heart of the Islamic State caliphate, even as the United States proceeds with a “deliberate, coordinated, disciplined withdrawal.”
"How do you sustain local security?” Shanahan said. “That’s where these partnerships are so critical."
Shanahan said the Islamic State had lost 99.5% of its former caliphate in Syria. But Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats said the group still commands "thousands of fighters" in Iraq and Syria in a report released today.
A US official told Al-Monitor that the withdrawal is conditions-based, and US-led airstrikes will continue, giving the coalition some wiggle room to deny the return of Islamic State fighters, even as American ships have already moved into the region to withdraw troops.
The Wall Street Journal reported earlier this month that the USS Kearsarge, an amphibious assault ship, will head to the region to provide backup to American forces as they depart Syria.
Shanahan is not slated to meet with the visiting Syrian Kurdish delegation, according to a senior defense official. At the Pentagon briefing, his first formal press conference since assuming the acting role, he did not elaborate on any possible US plans to protect the Kurds. Ahmed said the trip to meet US officials will be centered on getting clarity from the Donald Trump administration on the US withdrawal timeline.
Ahmed’s trip made a splash Monday night when her delegation ran into President Trump at Trump International Hotel, where he was dining with members of the administration and Congress.
The commander-in-chief raised the possibility of a safe zone to protect Syrian Kurds in their brief encounter, according to the Kurdish leader.
“Of course we’re asking the US government for alternative plans, to slow the withdrawal,” Ahmed said today. “What we are asking is to keep the safety and stability of the area.” She said there was no agreement with the Pentagon to return weapons handed over to the Syrian Democratic Forces during the campaign against the Islamic State, although defense officials once said that was a condition of US armed support.
But it’s not clear that Ahmed’s message is being heard in Washington. A source familiar with her plans said Ahmed hopes to meet with officials from the Pentagon and State Department, as well as members of Congress, but did not provide further details.
Ahmed met with Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., earlier this week, according to a spokesman for her group. Meanwhile, Sen. John Kennedy, R-La., has offered an amendment to a pending Middle East legislative package that would authorize Trump to use force to protect the Syrian Kurds. 
Back in Syria, she said, there are no signs that Assad will accept any form of Kurdish self-governance in Syria or changes to the constitution.
“We are not at the negotiating table,” she said. “We are excluded.”
 By Jack Detsch
Reference:
https://www.al-monitor.com/pulse/originals/2019/01/syria-kurds-join-forces-assad-us-withdraw.html

Tuesday, January 8, 2019


The Kurds fighting for their survival, Turkey is not helping much

Over the past decade, Turkey has pursued a "break and dent" strategy against the Kurds, by which the Turkish government seeks to dismantle Kurdish groups and push resistant factions into neighboring Syria and Iraq. Turkey has now come to rely on this strategy outside its border, particularly in the northern Syrian region of Afrin.  Based on this approach, Ankara aims to “cleanse” all northeastern Syrian territories held by the People’s Protection Units, or the YPG. Yet this "break and dent" strategy is futile, and the Mahkmour refugee camp in Iraq, set up by Turkish Kurds banished from their native villages more than two decades ago, is an example of its futility.
On Dec. 13, a day after President Recep Tayyip Erdogan announced plans for a military operation east of the Euphrates in Syria, Turkish jets targeted Sinjar and Makhmour in Iraq. According to Ankara, the Kurdistan Workers Party (PKK) — considered a terrorist organization by Turkey and much of the international community — is using the Makhmour camp as a base. Officials of the Kurdistan Democratic Party, the dominant political force in Iraqi Kurdistan, pointed out that UN rules require the camp to not harbor armed elements.
The camp is hardly an ordinary camp. Discussing its links with the PKK is meaningless, for its residents are families who have lost children fighting in PKK ranks. Armed units have taken up positions in self-defense in the area to protect residents from the Islamic State (IS). The Makhmour camp is essentially a lab demonstrating the failure of Turkey's security-centered policies.
More than 12,000 Kurds live in the camp, located on a slope of the Qarachokh Mountains. How they ended up there is a long and tragic story, which began in the '90s, when Turkey emptied 4,000 Kurdish villages as part of a military campaign to “root out” the PKK.
The story of Sakir Tong, a 37-year-old resident of the camp, is more or less the story of the camp itself. In an interview with Al-Monitor, the father of six, who makes a living as a construction worker in Erbil and Sulaimaniyah, recounted how his family fled their village in 1993 and crossed into Iraq.
Tong was born in 1981 in southeastern Turkey, in the small village of Isikveren, known as Bileh in Kurdish, located a stone’s throw from Uludere and the Iraqi border. In the early '90s, the Turkish government escalated its extrajudicial killings of PKK members and sympathizers in the region. During that period, the PKK raided a military outpost in the nearby village of Tasdelen, which marked the onset of a harsh government crackdown, Tong recounted.
The Turkish government “branded everyone terrorists,” he continued. “The road to Uludere was already closed for a year. We were meeting our needs from Zakho [in Iraqi Kurdistan]. The villages were shelled almost every night. We could not sleep and people got killed. Once a week, they would surround our village and search the houses for [PKK] guerrillas.”
The villagers, Tong said, came under pressure to join the village guard, a government-armed militia backing the army against the PKK. “They would keep people out in the snow and torture them. ‘You’ll choose either the mountain or the state,’ they would press. When the villagers refused to join the village guard, they said, ‘Then you go away.’ The village had 75 households, and all of them, except seven or eight, fled in September 1993. Bileh was the first village to be emptied,” he said, adding that other villages shared the same fate the following year.
The villagers went to Zakho across the border, where two camps were set up to harbor them, with the United Nations providing aid, Tong said. The refugees, he explained, had to move four more times until May 1998, when they settled outside Makhmour, a town 62 miles south of Erbil.
The location of the camp in Makhmour was not without reason. Turkey did not want the refugees near the border because it believed they would abet the PKK. The Kurdistan Democratic Party also saw the refugees as an extension of the PKK. The refugees then moved southward, toward Makhmour, out of the control of Iraqi Kurdistan but still within the boundaries of the US-enforced no-fly zone, which protected the Kurds from Saddam Hussein. In short, the place was a buffer zone. The UN High Commissioner for Refugees, which had already granted the group refugee status, was responsible for running the camp. Provisions came to the camp as part of the UN Oil for Food program. In 2011, the aid was reduced before being terminated in 2013. The Iraqi government began sending monthly flour supplies. That assistance was scaled down to once every three or four months in the wake of Iraqi Kurdistan’s independence referendum in 2017. Apart from that, charitable people continue to provide food and fuel to the refugees.
The residents of the camp, which once resembled a prison, established committees to deal with all their affairs. Thus, the “democratic self-rule” promoted by the Kurdish movement was for the first time put into practice here, rather spontaneously and under the strain of harsh conditions. The camp is run by the following entitites: a local administration based on neighborhood assemblies; a popular assembly selected every two years; a three-member council selected by the assembly; and an executive body. In other words, Makhmour became a pilot scheme for democratic self-rule, even before the effort in Rojava in Syria.
According to information Al-Monitor obtained from the Makhmour administration, nearly 3,000 pupils attend four kindergartens, five primary schools, a secondary school and a high school built by the UN. Their diplomas are certified by the Iraqi Ministry of Education. Textbooks from Turkey are used in the curriculum. Volunteers from the camp serve as teachers. Those who wish to pursue higher education go to universities in Erbil, Sulaimaniyah and Dahuk. Graduates of medical schools work in the camp’s hospital, replacing the doctors appointed by Baghdad. The imams of the two mosques are also from the camp.
The Makhmour camp came under the spotlight when Ankara expressed its desire to open up peace talks with the Kurds. In a gesture of support for the peace process, a 34-strong group, including PKK militants from the Qandil Mountains and residents of the Makhmour camp, crossed to Turkey from Iraq in October 2009. The gesture, which was coordinated with Ankara, backfired and seven members of the group were eventually sent to prison on charges of affiliation with the PKK. The incident showed how risky the way back home could be, even with a greenlight from Ankara.
Among the camp's residents, only about 20 elderly people hold Turkish passports. They managed to renew their ID cards during trips to Turkey, before the peace process collapsed in 2015. Without a passport, a series of bureaucratic and legal procedures become impossible for camp residents. The camp residents received three-year residence papers from the Iraqi government in 2013, but the documents have yet to be renewed. Many work on construction sites in Kurdistan, while others raise livestock.
When it comes to the issue of armed men in the camp, the PKK sent guerrillas from Qandil to help rescue the camp after it was captured by IS, along with the town of Makhmour, in August 2014. The camp’s liberation was followed by the creation of a 300-strong self-defense force, and the PKK took defense positions in the mountain pass. The UN, which closed its office at the entrance of the camp in 2014, is now under pressure from Ankara to crack down on the camp. Ankara argues that the camp has been taken over by terrorists.
According to Tong, Turkey’s Dec. 13 air raid hit a farming area adjacent to houses, killing a 14-year-old girl and three women, among them a woman in her 70s. “About 75% of camp residents are women and children," Tong said. "All people here are relatives. There is great pain and anger.”
Tong added that military officials came from Makhmour to examine the damage. “They promised protection and went away," he said. "UN officials are coming every other day and saying they will reopen the office. There is indignation toward the UN for doing nothing.”
According to Tong, “The guerrillas came in 2014, but they left in 2016. Camp residents are now maintaining the security. People aged 18 to 60 are keeping watch, including women without children.”
The round-the-clock watch in the camp stems from fears that IS might return. “Daesh is still active in the Gani Hazali area, which is 3 kilometers from the camp,” Tong said, using the Arabic acronym for the jihadi group. “The US forces occasionally bomb Daesh targets. In 2016, Daesh attacked again, killing two people. The Daesh threat is not over.”
The Makhmour camp holds a mirror to Ankara's failed Kurdish policies. In pursuing the break-up of the Kurdish regions in northern Syria, Ankara will reach yet another dead end.
Author:
Fehim Tastekin


Sunday, December 30, 2018

Who is more respectful of Christmas celebrations? Iran and Syria, or Saudi Arabia and Israel?

Christmas is a time of goodwill to all men. Or at least it should be. But while the West’s Middle East ‘bad guys’ Iran and Syria, showed the Yuletide spirit (period of several days around and including Christmas day), its closest allies, Saudi Arabia and Israel, failed to do so.
Iran is demonized by Western neocons and we’re meant to see the country as an evil, ‘monster‘ regime of foaming-at-the-mouth religious fanatics who hate everyone.
So it goes against the dominant narrative somewhat that Iran’s Foreign Minister Javad Zarif tweeted a Christmas message and wished ‘peace and joy to all in 2019’, on Christmas Eve.
From Javad Zarif:
The angels said, "Mary, God gives you good tidings of a Word from Him whose name is Messiah, Jesus, son of Mary; high honored shall he be in this world and the next, near stationed to God. (QURAN 2:45)
May the blessings of the birth of Jesus usher peace and joy to all in 2019.
It also goes against the narrative, that Zarif, back in September, wished Jews, in Iran and across the world, “a very Happy New Year filled with peace and harmony.”
He also wished well to all Jews worldwide:
Iran's Zarif wishes 'happy Rosh Hashana' to Jews worldwide http://dlvr.it/QkLdKd 
We’re told repeatedly that the Iranian ‘regime’ is ‘anti-Semitic’, but do ‘anti-Semites’ wish Jews a happy ‘Rosh Hashanah’? If so, it's a rather strange definition.
The Iranian Foreign Minister also tweeted on December 26 a message of goodwill to Iran’s Zoroastrian community.
In fact, despite the large number of Christians from other countries who work in the country, including many Britons, the holding of any Christmas-related services or commemorations in Saudi Arabia is strictly banned. “The Christmas season – often a season where Christians around the world are most visible – is a tense time for Christians in Saudi Arabia, who have to celebrate the holiday in secret, risking arrest and deportation,” said Jeff King, President of the International Christian Concern, in 2016.
Imagine being a Christian and not being able to openly celebrate the birth of Christ. It happens in Saudi Arabia, yet Western leaders, so keen to lecture others about ‘human rights’ and ‘religious freedom’ stay silent, preferring to pick on Iran – where Christmas can be openly celebrated.
Syria is another country ‘monstered’ by the endless war lobby but where, against all the odds, the Christmas spirit is still maintained. Big seasonal celebrations were held this year in Aleppo and Damascus. Remember Aleppo?
It was recaptured by the Syrian Arab Army from Islamist ‘rebels’ two years ago this month, and the neocon/’liberal interventionist’ commentariat, and most of the political class portrayed it as a most terrible thing. Ian Austin MP said that people in Aleppo faced ‘slaughter’.
John Woodcock MP called the Morning Star newspaper ‘traitorous scum’ for referring to the recapture of Aleppo by Syrian forces of their own territory, as a ‘liberation’. But if you look at the pictures of Christians celebrating Christmas there once again, which they were forbidden to do under the western-backed head-chopping ’rebels’ you can see that the ‘L’ word was indeed appropriate.

Author: Neil Clark
Reference:
https://www.rt.com/op-ed/447671-christmas-iran-syria-israel-saudis/

Sunday, October 22, 2017

The bombing and destruction in Raqqa, Syria is only comparable to the destruction of Dresde by the Allies near the end of the Second World War. 
D,A, 
Trying to describe the destruction in Raqqa, Syria, the Russian Ministry of Defense compared it with the bombing of Dresden during the Second World War. 
In fact, the allied bombing of Dresden was very destructive indeed. It was carried out by two waves of bombings of more than 500 airplanes each focusing in an area of 2 km2 (the center of Dresden) in little more than 4 hours. Not only were ALL buildings completely destroyed, but all the people in the underground shelters were completely burned. A prisoner of war who took part in the cleaning work expressed that in some shelters with hundreds of people there were no traces of people, only a gelatinous mass mixed with shoes and other belongings.

The comparison of Raqqa with Dresden gives us an idea of the degree of destruction experienced by this Syrian city which before the war was a thriving and picturesque city on the banks of the Euphrates River with 250,000 inhabitants.
"What the US-led coalition did to Syria’s Raqqa is comparable to the infamous Allied bombing of Dresden in 1945, the Russian Defense Ministry said, adding that the allies may be rushing to pour money into Raqqa to cover up the aftermath.
Raqqa, which has served as the Syrian stronghold of the terrorist group Islamic State (IS, formerly ISIS/ISIL) since January 2014, was seized by the US-backed group Syrian Democratic Forces earlier this week. Some 80 percent of residential buildings in the city are estimated to have been rendered uninhabitable during the fighting, which involved massive bombardment by the US-led coalition’s airstrikes and artillery shelling.

 “Raqqa is still smoldering after the bombardment by the international coalition, and senior officials in Washington, Paris and Berlina are already pouring out pledges to allocate tens of millions of dollars and euros for reconstruction,” Russian Defense Ministry Spokesman Gen. Igor Konashenkov said Sunday.
He said the intention to help Raqqa residents was commendable, but Moscow could not but wonder why previously all its calls to deliver humanitarian aid to other parts of Syria had been ignored or rejected.
“We made a list of cities and villages most in need and we didn’t distinguish between ‘bad’ and ‘good’ Syrians. But the answer from Washington, Berlin, Paris and London has always been the same: we can’t, we won’t,” the general said.

The change of heart may indicate that the US-led coalition simply wants to get rid of the evidence of its “barbaric bombing” of Raqqa, which resulted in “thousands of civilians, which [the coalition] claimed to be liberating form ISIL, being buried under debris”.
“Raqqa’s fate calls to mind that of Dresden in 1945, leveled by the US-British bombings,” Konashenkov added, referring to the controversial campaign reaching a peak in February 1945, during which American and British bombers dropped over 3,900 tons of bombs on the Nazi-controlled German city, killing some 25,000 civilians and destroying much of its center. The military necessity for such an action was questioned by many people, while some, including British Prime Minister Winston Churchill, perceived its goal as terrorizing the German population.
The SDF began its siege of Raqqa in June, with the US-led coalition supporting it with airstrikes, artillery fire, intelligence and training. The hostilities caused an exodus of civilians from the city, with some 270,000 displaced persons currently living in refugee camps in the province. Some 1,800 to 1,900 civilians have been killed in the fighting, at least 1,300 of whom were killed by the coalition, according to an estimate by the Airwars monitoring group.

Tuesday, June 20, 2017

Destruction and death in the country of two rivers

Reflections on the war in Iraq and the emergence of the Islamic State (ISIS)

D. Anton

The situation in northern Iraq is extremely complex. 
The predominant population in the northeast of the country is of Kurdish origin. Iraqi Kurdistan consists of about 8 million inhabitants in 78,000 km2, with capital in the city of Erbil with 1.5 million inhabitants. 
Most of the population in this area is bilingual in Kurdish and Arabic languages. Also Aramaic (Assyrian neo-Aramaic), Turkic and Armenian are spoken by their respective communities.
Sunni-affiliated Islam is the main religion with little expression of Shiite Muslims (who are mostly in southern Iraq). There are other religious groups of varying importance. Assyrians of Aramaic speakers (about 80,000 people) are Christians, Yezidis, who are ethnically Kurdish but not Muslim (estimated at about 500,000) have their own religion that is related to ancient Persian Zoroastrianism.
To make the situation more complex, it is known that in Iraqi Kurdistan there are vast hydrocarbon deposits (at least 45 billion barrels) that make it the sixth oil reserve in the world. Several companies have signed agreements with the Kurdish government (usually with opposition from Baghdad) including Exxon, Total, Chevron, Talisman, GenEnergy, Hunt Oil, Gulf Keystone Petroleum and Marathon Oil. Effective extraction under Kurdish control began in 2007. Due to its economic power and geopolitical position, the Kurdish state (which is not internationally recognized) in fact is functioning as such.
The northwestern sector of Iraq (outside Kurdistan) is composed of mountainous and arid areas and is crossed by the Tigris River whose sediments generate the main agricultural lands. The population of this area is predominantly Sunni with small Shiite, Assyrian-Christian and Yazidis minorities. The main city of this area is Mosul with more than 1.5 million inhabitants.
The successive wars in Iraq, the US invasion, the overthrow and the death of Saddam Hussein, led to deep political instability triggering contradictions that were controlled during the dictatorship of Hussein.
The Kurds took advantage of the situation by creating a controlled area that has practically transformed itself into an independent state.
On the other hand, the continued military, political and cultural intervention of the Western powers in the Middle East led to an energetic reaction of the radical sectors of Islam, particularly the Iraqi and Syrian Sunnis, which led them to connect with the violent groups of Al Qaeda. From this alliance emerged an ultra-radical movement seeking to build an Islamic state (called the "caliphate") in northern Iraq and Syria. This group (ISIS) is extremely fundamentalist, trying to convert the non-Islamic groups by force and terror. The local communities (mainly Assyrian-Christian and Yasidis) who have managed to conserve their religions for many centuries do not wish to convert to Islam. 
The strategy of forcing the conversion led to measures of extreme cruelty with these populations. The details of these abuses are only partially known, and disturbing images have appeared in the media. It is clear that ISIS is systematically violating the human rights of Assyrian Christians, Yasidis and Kurdish communities in the territory they control. The only force capable of stopping this advance of ISIS seems to be the Kurdish army (peshmergas). With the support of the US and Western European countries the Kurds have recovered part of the areas previously under the power of the ISIS. The complexity of the situation makes it difficult to anticipate the political future 
However it seems that there are two ethnic-religious causes that deserve international support: the survival of the religious minorities, and the right of the Kurds to have their own state. For this to happen, the Kurdish communities have committed themselves fully to the autonomist struggle including the female peshmergas brigades. This fact, in violently patriarchal societies, shows a social, political and military aspect that calls attention and allows us to hope that in the future this discriminatory situation may begin to change. The Islamic State, on the other hand, represents the unbridled, discriminatory and fundamentalist reaction to the cultural and political changes that have taken place in the Iraqi.East Syria regions.
In fact, the extreme sectarianism of the Islamic State has managed to unite the political protagonists against it and it seems that it will not last long as a viable territorial force.  
However, after the disappearance of ISIS the conflicts for control of the area will continue. These territories are very important from a strategic point of view, particularly because they are the regiona thorugh which oleoducts and gasoducts are planned to transport the valuable Gulf hydrocarbons towards the Mediterranean coast and Europe.
From "Lands of Little Rain and Much Blood", Danilo Anton, Piriguazu Ediciones.





Sunday, May 7, 2017

The international alliance against the people of Syria

The Syrian regime of the secular and socializing Baath movement, which has vigorously opposed Israeli expansion since the creation of the Jewish state in Palestine, has long been in the sights of the United States, Israel and the conservative monarchies of the Persian Gulf.
Like so many Middle Eastern governments, the Syrian Baath is an authoritarian regime that largely bases its strength on the support of the Alawite and Shiite communities of the country. In order to prevent their overthrow by force, the Baathist presidents (Hafez Assad, succeeded by his son Bashar Assad) gained the support of the Soviet Union and then Russia, thanks to the granting of a base on the Syrian coast in support of Russian the Mediterranean fleet.
The conspiracy of the Baath's enemies included Israel, the CIA. The US government, the Gulf oil kingdoms and emirates, several European Union governments and, finally, the different jihadist groups, ISIS and Al Qaeda. Through this alliance, "rebel" movements were financed, organized and installed, systematically deforming information on the development of political and military events in Syria, This allowed to conceal the methods and intentions of these ultra-war policies.
The real victim of this bloody alliance is the Syrian people who suffered the death of more than 200,000 people and the expulsion of several million refugees. The country has been destroyed. However, the Baathist regime has resisted. And this is not because there is solid support for the Assad regime but because the ascent to power of the fake rebels would bes more death and destruction, transforming the Republic of Syria into another satellite of the bellicist and expansionist policies of the military- Industrial complex of the United States..

Reference to watch: Canadian journalist and activist Eva Bartlett, with extensive experience in Palestine and Syria, describes the situation beyond the misinformation of the mainstream media and international news agencies.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NCfw23f0Qz4

Tuesday, October 25, 2016

A strategy to promote terrorism in Syria and find an excuse to continue the war and sell weapons
Danilo Anton

The influential British magazine «The Economist» is suggesting that in Mosul, instead of corralling ISIL and completely defeating them, it would be a good idea to leave them an escape route. 
In fact an "escape route" is NOT possible to the East because the Kurds are well established there with a mighty army of Peshmerga.  However, for ISIL it would be possible to go westwards into Syria. Thus, the ISIL would continue the dream of the U.S. and United Kingdom to fight and perhaps defeat the Syrian government (with the unmentionable help of ISIL) which is their ultimate goal.
In that case, what could happen is that ISIL would take power in Syria generating a terrorist regime that would provide a nice excuse to continue the war against terrorism and sell weapons.
These British and US imperialists are just unbelievable.  
But do not worry as this will most likely not happen.  However, it is enough to know how they think and what they are capable of in order to defend their interests.

Friday, October 21, 2016

World War III?  
A single stupid mistake in Syria may trigger a global conflict

D.Anton
Russian free access to international seas and oceans is a complex issue. There are Russian ports in the Baltic sea (Kaliningrad, Primorsk, Saint Petersburg) but sailing out of the Baltic sea requires going through the Danish straits which are relatively narrow (width less than 30 km) between the Danish islands and Sweden. Because of its narrowness this passage is too vulnerable for the Russian fleet and commerce to depend on. Still more vulnerable is the passage from the Black Sea, where there are several Russian ports, to the Mediterranean Sea (Bosphorus strait). This strait has a length of 31 km and an average width of approximately 3 km. The Bosphorus flows (on both directions) through the Turkish territory, very close to the main Turkish city (Istambul).
Russia has also ports in the far East in Vladivostok, but its location is very far from the main production and population centers of the country.
There are active harbours on the Arctic sea, principally in the city of Murmansk, but its location is also somewhat inadequate because of the distance from the main urban centers of Russia, and also because of the restrictions due to its arctic location, periodic freezing and occurrence of icebergs and ice floes.
To overcome these limitations Russia has managed to obtain the authorization to use Syrian territory in the Tartus naval base on the Mediterranean sea.
This base is critical for the Russian fleet and therefore the Russian government will take measures to preserve it.
During the last few years there was an international campaign, mainly supported by the United States, some West European countries and Saudi Arabia to change the Syrian government, by supporting some Syrian rebel groups, The aim is to  promote the instauration of an anti-Russian regime in Syria which may cancel the treaties between Syria and Russia, and probably dislodge the Russians from Tartus.
However, Russia is supporting the Syrian regime both politically and militarily and will not allow to be dislodged from Tartus..  .
One stated strategy of the United States (according to Hillary Clinton, who will probably be the next president of the United States) will be to declare a no-fly zone in Syrian territory.
This measure will be difficult to enforce because presently the Russian air force is very active in Syria in support of the government.
How are the United States going to enforce the no-fly zone in Syria, against Russia? are they going to shoot down Russian airplanes? If so, will the Russian government tolerate it?
The United States is playing with fire. A no-fly zone was feasible in Serbia or Iraq. But in Syria it will be much more difficult. The Russians don’t like to be bullied, and they have the right weapons to respond.
A single stupid mistake may trigger a war between the main world powers. The Third World War ? 

http://www.salon.com/2016/10/21/hillary-clinton-admitted-in-2013-that-a-no-fly-zone-would-kill-a-lot-of-syrians-but-still-wants-one/ 

Thursday, October 13, 2016

Israel is the main promoter of the war in Syria 

Despite not appearing in the foreground Israel is the main promoter of the war in Syria.
In my opinion (it must be said) Israel is largely responsible for the outbreak of war in Syria (especially through their influence in the US but also promoting Islamic hyperterrorism by stealth but decisive).
The Israeli fascism has been the main enemy of Syria during the past 65 years.
The government of Israel is satisfied  of the hardships that the Syrian people is suffering and especially of the weakness of the Syrian government that benefits Israel both politically and militarily.
The Golan Heights, Syrian territory, has been occupied by Israel for almost 50 years.
Israel directly influence the US leadership through the powerful Zionist lobby in the Congress and indirectly also influences presidential decisions.
The US military aid to Israel today is 38,000 million dollars in a span of 10 years, not counting the diplomatic and commercial support.
The prolongation of the war in Syria and the war in Iraq and the pressure on Iran, work for the benefit of Israeli expansionism.
Meanwhile blood continues to be shed in Syria and Iraq ...
D.A.

Wednesday, October 12, 2016


How to totally destroy a country

D.Anton
Syria's population was 21 million before the war in an area of 185,000 km2 of which less than half are arable. Because of the war the population declined to 17 million. As a result of the war, economic losses are greater than 200,000 billion since the beginning of the conflict. Unemployment rose from 14.9 to 57.7%. 12 million people lost their main source of income, 80% of the inhabitants live in poverty.
There are almost 7,000,000 refugees in Syrian territory and 3,300,000 in neighboring countries plus 1,550,000 emigrants. 
A total of almost 12,000,000 people have lost or are out of their homes.
To that it should be added that 200,000 people were killed and nearly 1 million wounded.
And the war continues ...




Sunday, August 28, 2016

                
Geography, History and other issues
                                            Lebanon
Danilo Antón
Geography
Lebanon is a small country with coast on the eastern Mediterranean Sea. Its area is 10,452 km2 and the population approximately 4,500,000 inhabitants. The Lebanese geographical environment is heterogeneous. It consists of a coastal plain on the Mediterranean Sea that has more than 3 kilometers wide and is very densely populated.  Abruptly the relief climbs to a humid mountain range parallel to the coast  averaging 2,000 meters high with forests of cedars and pines called Mount Lebanon. The highest peak is Qumat as Sawda at 3.088 meters.
East of Mount Lebanon is the Beqaa, an elongated valley 120 kilometers long and about 18 wide average which is the main agricultural region. Finally, in the easternmost region there is another more arid mountain range called Anti-Lebanon, which marks the border with Syria. This chain peaks exceed 2,500 meters, the highest is Mount Hermon at 2,814 meters and Ta'la't Musa at 2.669 meters.
Despite its smallness, historical and geopolitical importance of the country far exceeds its size and population. First, it is worth remembering that the Lebanese diaspora in the world is much larger than the country's own population. It is estimated that there are more than 14 million Lebanese descendants distributed worldwide. Only in Brazil there are estimated 6 million Lebanese, there are more than 1 million in Argentina, 500,000 in the United States, 200,000 in Canada and over 50,000 in Uruguay. Figure 1 Beirut
                               
                                         
History
The Lebanese territory was populated by Semitic peoples 3,500 years ago who came from the South and founded cities on the coast: Byblos, Sidon, Tyre (now Beirut). They were commercial societies who were called Phoenicians by the Greeks.
It was in Byblos, around 2000 BC, that the first alphabet, composed exclusively of consonants, was created. From the shores of Phoenicia came out commercial expeditions and several cities were founded along the coasts of the Mediterranean Sea :  Carthage, Genoa, Venice, Marseille, Cadiz, Cagliari, Palermo, Malaga. Huelva, Tarragona and Tangier among others.
Phoenicia fell under Assyrian domination (IX-VII centuries BC).  It was conquered by the Babylonian Kingdom (VII-VI centuries), by Persia (VI-IV centuries B.C.), by Macedonian ( IV centuries BC) and in 54 B.C. It became part of the Roman province of Syria. The Arab period began in 636 A.D. until 1516 when the Lebanese territory (Phoenicia) was dominated by the Ottoman Empire. The Ottomans granted Lebanon a semi-autonomy under the rule of the Maans, a feudal family Druze and Shibabs, a Sunni family that had converted to Christianity.
After World War Lebanon and Syria became part of a mandate from the League of Nations under French colonial control until 1943 when unilaterally declared its independence. Figure 2 Mount Lebanon
                                                                                                                  
From the religious point of view the country is divided into numerous religions and churches. The percentages have varied due to emigration and presence of refugees, but in recent years Muslims have constituted almost 60% of the population, of which which 27% are Shi'a and Sunni the rest. There are also Alawite and Ismaili minorities. Christians belonging to the Maronite Catholic church represent 30% of the population. This church, which was founded by St. Maron in the late fourth century, is an Eastern Rite church that is in full communion with the Apostolic See of Rome, without giving up their own structures.
In addition to Muslims and Christians there are 5% Druzes (a monotheistic religion that does not practice neither the five pillars of Islam nor the Christian Eucharist).
These various religions confrontation each other for a long time. In order to solve that problem in 1943, when independence was declared, an unwritten agreement was established to distribute the power between the different ethnic and religious communities. It was agreed that the president would be a Maronite, the Spokesperson of Parliament, a Shiite, the Prime Minister a Sunni and the Deputy Minister a representative of the Greek Orthodox faith.
After the war the region Lebanon became very unstable due to the decolonization processes that resulted in the separation of Syria and Lebanon which became independent countries, and the withdrawal of the British from Palestine. The latter coincided with the creation of the state of Israel due to Jewish settlements that were gradually established on Palestinian land. Conflicts between Arabs and Jews in Israel were reflected in Lebanon who was forced to receive a very large contingent of Palestinians. Moreover, the successive wars between Israel and Arab countries, indirectly involving the various Lebanese groups, alternately supported or fought against Israel.
From 1976 to 2005, Lebanon was occupied by the Syrian army, who only retired following an impressive demonstration of 1 million people who demanded the withdrawal of these troops. The withdrawal became effective on March 14, 2005.  Figure 3 Beqaa Valley
                                                                                                                         
In Lebanon there are various political movements that generally have religious connotations.
The Amal Movement (abbreviation for Afwaj al-Mouqawma Al-Lubnaniyya) or Movement of Hope, is a Shiite political party founded in the early 1970s, from the Movement of the Disinherited, vindicating the rights of all religious groups to be respected in their rights and, in particular, denouncing the poverty in which the Shiite communities were living.
Hezbollah (Party of Allah) is a Lebanese Shiite militant Islamic group with its paramilitary wing, the Jihad Council. It emerged from the Amal Movement, but with an Islamic fundamentalist approach. It has had political support from Iran and Syria. It has developed an important military force, which is said to be more powerful than the Lebanese army itself. It has been described as a state within the state. It has parliamentary seats, a radio station and television, social services and even deployment beyond the country's borders. In the 2006 war Israel fought Hezbollah.
The Lebanese Phalangist or Kataeb party is the main movement of Christian denomination in the country. As Hezbollah has its own militia and has been involved in most of the internal conflicts since 1936.
Sunnis are generally integrated into the traditional institutional life. An example of this is the Jamaa Islamiya movement which left aside the claims of building an Islamic state in the country and participates in parliamentary activity. Another group with similar trends is Jam'iyat al-Mashari 'al-Khayriya, also known as Al Ahbash.
Other Sunni organizations seeking to create an Islamic state but without the use of violence, are Tabligh wa Dawa, also known as Tablighi Jamaat.
All Shiite, Christians and Sunni organizations that do not advocate violence are now faced with the radical group Al Qaeda and ISIS and many of them have suffered several attacks that have costed the lives of several leaders of these groups.
refugees
Some 450,000 Palestinian refugees are registered in the United Nations World Refugee Agency (UNRWA) in Lebanon of which 53% live in 12 refugee camps. Because they are not citizens of another state they do not have the same rights as foreigners living and working in Lebanon.  Palestinian refugees in the Lebanese refugees are living in abject poverty. Recently, due to the war in Syria, many Palestinian refugees who lived there moved to Lebanon in search of security by adding their social, economic and demographic weight in the country. Figure 4 Palestinian refugee camp
                                                          Since the war began in Syria in 2011 refugees have arrived from that country to settle in Lebanon. There are an estimated 1.5 million Syrian refugees in Lebanon of which 1,050,000 are registered with UNRWA. 53% of them are children . they have not been established in refugee camps but rather they were distributed nationwide.
Many of them (18%) live in makeshift camps concentrated in the border provinces. Currently only 29% have residence permits. Most Syrian refugees (89%) live below the poverty line.
Because of the war in Syria and the crisis of refugees, Lebanon has faced a humanitarian crisis, economic instability and increased sectarian violence. In general, Lebanon has maintained an open-door policy, however, because the influx of refugees has increased exponentially since August 2013 the economic and social impact has been very important. Reduced economic growth, rising poverty and unemployment, pressure on public services have increased social fragmentation and political tensions. There has also been a resurgence of sectarian violence with numerous reports of bombings, assassinations and isolated battles between the army and militias. Figure 5 Syrian refugees camp
                                                                          
The immediate future and stability of Lebanon rely heavily on the evolution of the Syrian conflict, on the will of the international community to provide adequate humanitarian assistance, and on a proper balance of sectarian tensions. In the long term, the problems of Lebanon are the problems of the region. They have been getting worse in most of the countries, and it will not be easy for a multi-denominational small country, which has been historically conflictual, inserted in an area of ​​great geopolitical instability, to stay apart from the influences of geopolitical tensions.