Petroleum issues
are constantly on the front pages of the newspapers.
It is considered
the most valuable resource in our contemporary energy hungry civilization.
Oil and its
derivatives are essential to move cars, airplanes, thermoelectric plants and
plastic industries. Its economic importance is indisputable.
Geopolitical
interests have generated instability in several oil producing countries leading
to conflicts and wars and sustained variation in prices. Sharp increases during
the period 1970-1980 (from U$S 10 to U$S 100) per barrel, decreasing in the
1980s and increasing again in the first
decade of the 21st century. During the last two years a sudden retreat of
barrels price took place, and by November 2015 it reached 40 U$S.
The price
continued to descend reaching below 30 dollars to go up again. Presently, in 2018, the Brent barrel has attained 67 dollares.
One of the main
arguments for the 1970s and other price increases at later dates, was based on
the widespread belief that the genesis of oil and other hydrocarbons were
biological in nature, and therefore oil fields would be restricted exclusively
to the sedimentary basins of the world.
Most scientists
assume that it is in these basins that fossil plants and/or animals have
accumulated to give rise to oil and natural gas.
So much so, that
in the common vocabulary, hydrocarbons are called “fossil fuels”.
According to
this reasoning, stocks of oil and gas would be limited and would be, by
definition, non-renewable resources.
The predicted
relatively low volumes of hydrocarbons, their non-renewable nature and their
widespread need, would explain and justify
past and potential future price increases and their importance in the
economy of many countries.
At present these
premises are generally accepted and political strategies of states and business
organizations are based on them.
It is the theory
of biological origin or biogenic of
hydrocarbons.
However, with
the currently available evidence, and based on the views of some
astrophysicists and geologists, one can say that the belief that oil and gas
have a fossil origin has a very weak scientific backing.
The substitute
theory, which considers more adequately the data of reality, sustains that oil,
natural gas and carbonaceous ore formations have a mineral origin and their
stocks are virtually inexhaustible.
It is the
mineral or abiogenic theory on the origin of hydrocarbons.
According to
this approach, the hydrocarbons are generated through processes of planetary
degassing. These are processes by which the various compounds of carbon and
hydrogen rise from the planet’s interior and recombine in the upper mantle
(adapting to new conditions of temperature and pressure) ascending into the
Earth crust to accumulate in areas where this rise is obstructed (often in the
sedimentary basins).
Some adherents
to the mineral theory, particularly the Austrian astrophysicist Thomas Gold,
argue that rising oil oxidizes in depth due to the action of certain bacteria
(hyperthermal bacteria), forming water and carbon dioxide, and leaving behind
reduced waste minerals (forming sometimes metallic ore).
These phenomena
would occur in all planets of the solar system (and probably in other star
systems) where temperature is appropriate. Therefore it would be reasonable to
assume that this type of underground life would be the rule while the shallow
life (as in the Earth) would be the exception.
Similarly, Gold
says that the movements of hydrocarbonaceous fluids in depth and their surface
emissions are causing the majority of seismic events and tsunamis (perhaps
all).
In short, the
integral and systemic theory developed by this Austrian astrophysicist
radically rethinks, not only the beliefs about the origin of oil and other
hydrocarbons, but the very foundations of geology and planetary astrophysics.
The book
presented here aims to provide a synthesis of these ideas, framed in the new
approaches about the nature of life and their distribution in space, developed
by Fred Hoyle and other researchers from the Institute of Astrobiophysics of
Cardiff.
We aim to
introduce new evidence on an issue that until now has been considered
unilaterally, and even in a dogmatic manner, by many scientists and academics,
with significant implications in terms of the economy and society.
No comments:
Post a Comment