Global warming is pseudoscience
Nobel Prize Winner Dr. Ivar Giaever analizes the
climate change- global warming scare and define it as pseudoscience.[i]
Danilo
Anton
Measuring
mean atmospheric temperature change as a climatic parameter requires a very
sophisticated and dense stable and trustable network of observation
stations, which does not exist worldwide, not even in developed countries, and
at least 30 years of records. Well, 30 years show how local climate IS, but you
may need another 30 years to check if indeed it has changed.
It is
possible also to get temperature records from satellites. There has been
temperature measuring satellites for about 40-56 years and the results are
mixed. There were some temperature changes at different
tropospheric-stratopheric levels, but it is difficult to integrate these
results into a single global mean temperature number.
In
addition is should be remembered that air temperature changes are mainly the results
of oceanic temperature changes. However, measured oceanic temperatures have increased or decreased but
there is not a well defined trend.
In some
places of Antarctica and Greenland there has been melting of ice, however,
there are many data that show that in both places the volume of ice has
increased.
So why
are some scientists, and specially politicians insist in something that has not
been proved?
Of course
there are economic interests. The sale of carbón credits giving the right to
emit one tonne of carbón dioxide each is
big business. There is also plenty of money in projects to study global warming
or climate change. So some scientists do not dare to deny something that is
giving them a good income.
This new «climate
change religión», as it has happened in the past, does not need
justification. It is based on propaganda
and publicity. People are scared of this horrible future and politicians will
award money for whatever project deals with this global scurge.
Nobel
Prize winner Ivar Giaever explains the whole thing very clearly.
Here
there is a reproducton of an article dealing with this issue.
"Nobel
Prize Winning Physicist Dr. Ivar Giaever: ‘Global warming is a
non-problem’ ‘I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but you’re wrong. Dead wrong.’
Dr. Ivar
Giaever, a Nobel Prize-Winner for physics in 1973, declared his dissent on
man-made global warming claims at a Nobel forum on July 1, 2015.
“I would say
that basically global warming is a non-problem,” Dr. Giaever announced during his speech titled “Global Warming
Revisited.”
Giaever, a former professor at the School of
Engineering and School of Science Rensselaer Polytechnic
Institute, received the 1973 physics Nobel for his work on quantum
tunneling. Giaever delivered his remarks at the 65th Nobel Laureate Conference
in Lindau, Germany, which drew 65 recipients of the prize. Giaever is also
featured in the new documentary “Climate Hustle”, set for release in Fall 2015.
Giaever was one of President Obama’s key scientific
supporters in 2008 when he joined over 70 Nobel Science
Laureates in endorsing Obama in an October 29, 2008 open letter.
Giaever signed his name to the letter which
read in part:
“The country urgently needs a visionary leader…We are
convinced that Senator Barack Obama is such a leader, and we urge you to join
us in supporting him.”
But seven years after signing the letter,
Giaever now mocks President Obama for warning that “no challenge poses a
greater threat to future generations than climate change”. Giaever called it a
“ridiculous statement.”
“That
is what he said. That is a ridiculous statement,” Giaever explained.
“I say this to Obama: Excuse me, Mr. President, but
you’re wrong. Dead wrong,” Giaever said. (Watch Giaever’s full 30-minute July 1 speech here.)
“How can he say that? I think Obama
is a clever person, but he gets bad advice. Global warming is all wet,” he
added.
“Obama said last year that 2014 is hottest year ever.
But it’s not true. It’s not the hottest,”
Giaever noted. [Note: Other scientists have
reversed themselves on climate change. See: Politically Left Scientist
Dissents – Calls President Obama ‘delusional’ on global warming]
The
Nobel physicist questioned the basis for rising carbon dioxide fears.
“When
you have a theory and the theory does not agree with the experiment then you have to cut out the theory. You were
wrong with the theory,” Giaever explained.
Global Warming ‘a new religion’
Giaever said his climate research was
eye opening. “I was horrified by what I found” after researching the
issue in 2012, he noted.
“Global warming really has become a new
religion. Because you cannot discuss it. It’s not proper. It
is like the Catholic Church.”
Concern
Over ‘Successful’ UN Climate Treaty
“I am
worried very much about the [UN] conference in Paris in November. I really
worry about that. Because the [2009 UN] conference was in Copenhagen and that
almost became a disaster but nothing got decided. But now I think that the
people who are alarmist are in a very strong position,” Giaever said.
“The
facts are that in the last 100 years we have measured the temperatures it has
gone up .8 degrees and everything in the world has gotten better. So how can
they say it’s going to get worse when we have the evidence? We live longer,
better health, and better everything. But if it goes up another .8 degrees we
are going to die I guess,” he noted.
Silencing
Debate
Giaever
accused Nature Magazine of “wanting to cash in on the [climate] fad.”
“My
friends said I should not make fun of Nature because then they won’t publish my
papers,” he explained.
“No
one mentions how important CO2 is for plant growth. It’s a wonderful
thing. Plants are really starving. They don’t talk about how good it is for
agriculture that CO2 is increasing,” he added.
Extreme
Weather claims
“The
other thing that amazes me is that when you talk about climate change it is
always going to be the worst. It’s got to be better someplace for heaven’s
sake. It can’t always be to the worse,” he said.
“Then
comes the clincher. If climate change does not scare people we can scare people
talking about the extreme weather,” Giaever said.
“For the last hundred years, the ocean
has risen 20 cm — but for the previous hundred years the ocean also has risen
20 cm and for the last 300 years, the ocean has also risen 20 cm per 100 years.
So there is no unusual rise in sea level. And to be sure you understand that I
will repeat it. There is no unusual rise in sea level,” Giaever said.
“If anything we have entered period of
low hurricanes. These are the facts,” he continued.
“You
don’t’ have to even be a scientist to look at these figures and you understand
what it says,” he added.
“Same
thing is for tornadoes. We are in a low period on in U.S.”
Here is a speech given
by Dr. Ivar Giaever on this topic.
No comments:
Post a Comment