No, the Arctic is not melting
The Arctic Circle is the most extreme place on our planet where seasonal changes
can range from +35.0°C in July and -65.0°C in February; […] on average 75% of
the year is spent below the melting point of water [and] on average the Arctic
will be covered by ice/snow for the same proportion of time, i.e., 75% or 9
months of the year.
The same seasonal extreme
variations in air temperatures are also observed in ice cover variations observed
in the Arctic where the winter‘s ice cover can be between 14- 16 million km2,
while during summer the area covered can vary between 4 and 8 million km2. Based on observations, dating back to 1900, it can
be concluded that it is physically impossible for the Arctic to be ice/snow
free in the foreseeable future since the air temperatures were as cold in 2013
as they were in 1900.
Since ice cannot melt below 0.0°C, all these
observations point towards the Arctic remaining ice-covered for the next 100
years. It must also follow that any
theory predicting imminent melting of the Arctic ice cap cannot be based on
thermometer-recorded data and, therefore, must be wrong and will merely be an
artefact of using the term temperature where there is no true association with
the calibrated thermometer, the instrument used to measure temperature in all
physical, medical and engineering sciences.
Conclusion
So, what are the hard facts about
Arctic that are based on the observations made by calibrated thermometers at 20
stations across the Arctic Circle and which conclusions can be made based on
those observations?
1. Temperatures in the Arctic between
1900 and the present day are a long distance below 0.0°C for at least 9 months
per year and can be as low as -64.0°C
2. It is impossible to separate the
youngest from the oldest years using thermometerbased daily or monthly
Tmax/Tmin data
3. The total ranges observed in
daily Tmax/Tmin data can be as high as 100.0°C and as low as 75.0°C making the
Arctic Circle the most variable and extreme area on our planet therefore making
any accurate forecasting of future temperature patterns and trends impossible
4. The switches between the extreme
hot to extreme cold temperatures are very frequent and very unpredictable and
can occur within the same month, same year or between two consecutive years
5. The large observed ice gain/loss
variations are pre-determined by the large observed variations in air
temperatures
6. Since the air temperatures
are chaotic in nature it must follow that the extent of the ice cover has to be
chaotic as well and, since we cannot predict future events of a chaotic system,
we cannot predict future trends of either air temperatures or ice cover
patterns
Based on the facts above only one
conclusion can be made in reference to the putative melting of the Arctic:
historical thermometer-based data tells us that between 1900 and 2014 arctic
temperatures were for 75% of the time consistently long distance below 0.0°C;
the ice cover in the winter months is still consistently more than
14,000,000km2 and, therefore, it is physically impossible
for the Arctic to be already melting since nothing has changed since 1900 till
present day. The only sensible forecast for
the future would be to expect the same extreme events to continue until
thermometer-based evidence tell us otherwise.
Let me conclude this paper by
answering the question asked in the first part of the title by a categorical No, the Arctic is not melting. As long as temperatures remain
the same as they have been for the last 100 years the Arctic will remain frozen
in the long winter months and partly melt during very short summer months.
The answer to the second question
is that the theory of global warming is
completely disconnected from the observations since their definition of temperature is based on
some theoretical number that has nothing to do with the temperature that is
measured by calibrated thermometer and, most importantly, used as an
international standard by the scientific community. Since the
theory is clearly wrong about forecasting the temperature patterns in the
Arctic, all other predictions made by the theory must be wrong too.
lobal Warming Theory ‘Completely Disconnected From the Observations’
No comments:
Post a Comment