Antarctic climate
change
The
following is an important reference regarding climate changes in Antarctica
during the last 2000 years.
Antarctic climate variability at regional and continental
scales over the last 2,000 years
Abstract. Climate trends in the Antarctic region remain
poorly characterised, owing to the brevity and scarcity of direct climate observations
and the large magnitude of interannual to decadal-scale climate variability. Here,
within the framework of the
PAGES Antarctica 2k
working group, we build an enlarged database of ice core water stable isotope
records from Antarctica, consisting of 112 records. We produce both unweighted
and weighted isotopic (δ18O)
composites and temperature
reconstructions since 0
CE, binned at 5 and 10-year resolution, for 7 climatically-distinct regions
covering the Antarctic continent. Following earlier work of the Antarctica 2k
working group, we also produce composites and reconstructions for the
broader regions of East
Antarctica, West Antarctica, and the whole continent. We use three methods for
our temperature
reconstructions: i) a
temperature scaling based on the δ18O-temperature relationship output from an
ECHAM5-wiso model
simulation nudged to
ERA-interim atmospheric reanalyses from 1979 to 2013, and adjusted for the West
Antarctic Ice Sheet
region to borehole
temperature data; ii) a temperature scaling of the isotopic normalized
anomalies to the variance of the regional reanalysis temperature and iii) a
composite-plus-scaling approach used in a previous continental scale
reconstruction
of Antarctic temperature
since 1 CE but applied to the new Antarctic ice core database. Our new
reconstructions confirm a significant cooling trend from 0 to 1900 CE across
all Antarctic regions where records extend back into the 1st millennium, with the exception of the
Wilkes Land coast and Weddell Sea coast regions. Within this long-term cooling
trend from 0-1900 CE we find that the warmest period occurs between 300 and
1000 CE, and the coldest interval from 1200 to 1900 CE. Since
1900 CE, significant
warming trends are identified for the West Antarctic Ice Sheet, the Dronning
Maud Land coast and the Antarctic Peninsula regions, and these trends are
robust across the distribution of records that contribute to the unweighted
isotopic composites and
also significant in the weighted temperature reconstructions. Only for the
Antarctic Peninsula is this most recent century-scale trend unusual in the
context of natural variability over the last 2000-years. However, projected
warming of the Antarctic
continent during the 21st Century may soon see significant and unusual warming
develop across other parts of the Antarctic continent. The extended Antarctica
2k ice core isotope database developed by this working group
opens up many avenues for
developing a deeper understanding of the response of Antarctic climate to
natural and anthropogenic climate forcings. The first long-term quantification
of regional climate in Antarctica presented herein is a basis for data-model
comparison and assessments of past, present and future driving factors of
Antarctic climate.
1 Introduction
Antarctica is the region
of the world where instrumental climate records are shortest and sparsest. Estimates
of temperature change with reasonable coverage across the full Antarctic
continent are only available since 1958 CE (Nicolas and Bromwich, 2014), and
the large magnitude of year-to-year climate variability that characterises
Antarctica makes the interpretation of trends in this data sparse region
problematic (Jones et al., 2016). As a result, the knowledge of past Antarctic
temperature and climate variability is predominantly dependent on proxy records
from natural archives. While coastal proxy records are being
developed from
terrestrial and marine archives (Jones et al., 2016), information on Antarctic
climate above the ice sheet
exclusively relies on the
climatic interpretation of ice core records.
Within the variety of
measurements performed in boreholes and ice cores, only water stable isotopes
can provide subdecadal resolution records of past temperature changes (Küttel
et al., 2012). In high accumulation areas of coastal zones and West
Antarctica, annual layer
counting is feasible during the last centuries to millennia (Plummer et al.,
2012; Abram et al., 2013; Thomas et al., 2013; Sigl et al. 2016; Winstrup et
al. in prep.), and annual water stable isotope signals can be delivered.
However, in the dry
regions of the central Antarctic plateau, where the longest ice core records
are available, chronologies are less accurate and rely on the identification of
volcanic deposits that can be used to tie ice cores from different sites to a
common
Antarctic ice core age
scale (Sigl et al., 2014 and 2015).
The chemical and physical
signals measured in an individual ice core reflect a local climatic signal
archived through the deposition and reworking of snow layers. The intermittency
of Antarctic precipitation, variability in precipitation source
regions, and
post-depositional effects of snow layers including wind drift and scouring,
sublimation, and snow metamorphism can distort the climate signal preserved
within ice cores and produces non-climatic noise. As a result, obtaining a
robust climate
signal can only be
achieved through the combination of multiple ice core records from a given site
and/or region, and through the site-specific calibration of the relationships
between water stable isotopes and temperature.
Water can be
characterised by the stable isotope ratios of oxygen (δ18O: the deviation of the ratio of 18O/16O
in a sample, relative to that of the standard, Vienna Standard Mean Ocean
Water) and of deuterium (δD: the
deviation of the ratio of 2H/1H).
Both of these parameters
within ice cores provide information on past temperatures. There is solid
theoretical understanding of distillation processes relating moisture transport
towards the polar regions with air mass cooling and the progressive loss of
heavy water molecules
along the condensation pathway (Jouzel and Merlivat, 1984). This theoretical
understanding is further supported by numerical modelling performed using
atmospheric general circulation models equipped with water stable
isotopes (Jouzel, 2014).
The effects of these processes are observed in the spatial relationships
between the isotopic composition of Antarctic precipitation/surface snow and
surface air temperature across the continent. However, relationships between
water stable isotopes in snow and surface temperature may vary through time as
a result of changes between condensation and surface temperature (in
relationship to changes in boundary layer stability), changes in moisture
origin and initial evaporation
conditions, changes in atmospheric transport pathways and changes in
precipitation seasonality or intermittency (Masson-Delmotte et al., 2008). Investigations
based on the sampling of Antarctic precipitation have demonstrated that
seasonal and inter-annual isotope versus temperature slopes are generally
smaller than spatially-derived relationships (van Ommen and Morgan, 1997;
Schneider et al., 2005; Stenni et al., 2016; Schlosser et al., 2004; Ekaykin et
al.,
2004; Fernandoy et al.,
2010). Moreover, emerging studies combining the monitoring of surface water
vapour isotopic composition with the isotopic composition retained in surface
snow and precipitation have revealed that snow-air isotopic exchanges during
snow metamorphism affect surface snow isotopic composition (Ritter et al.,
2016; Casado et al., 2016a; Casado et al., 2016b; Touzeau et al., 2016). It is
not yet possible to assess the importance of such post-deposition processes for
the interpretation of ice core water stable isotope records, but they may
enhance the relationship between snow isotopic composition and surface
temperature more than expected from the intermittency of snowfall (Touzeau et
al., 2016). Changes in ice sheet height due to ice dynamics may also affect the
surface climate trends inferred from water stable isotope records;
however, this influence
should be of second order over the last 2000-year interval that is the focus of
this study (Fegyveresi et al., 2011).
As a result, the two key
challenges to reconstruct past changes in Antarctic temperature from ice core
isotope records are (1) to develop methodologies to combine different
individual or stacked ice core records in order to deliver regional-scale
climate signals, and (2) to quantify the temperature changes represented by
water stable isotope variations.
Goosse et al. (2012)
first calculated a composite of Antarctic temperature simply by averaging seven
standardized temperature records inferred from water stable isotopes using a
spatial isotope-temperature relationship for the last millennium. The first
coordinated effort to
reconstruct Antarctic temperature during the last 2000 years (PAGES 2k
Consortium, 2013) screened published ice core records for annual layer counting
or alignment of volcanic sulphate records and overlap with instrumental
temperature data (Steig
et al., 2009), leading to the selection of 11 records. The reconstruction
procedure used a composite-plus-scaling approach similar to the methodology of
Schneider et al. (2006), and produced reconstructions of the continent-
wide temperature history
as well as specific West Antarctica and East Antarctica reconstructions. The
skill of the reconstructions was limited by the number of available records
through time (for instance, only one predictor in each region prior to 166CE).
This analysis identified significant (p<0.01) cooling trends from 166 to
1900 CE, 2.5 times larger in West Antarctica than in East Antarctica. A robust
cooling trend over this time period has also been identified from terrestrial
and marine reconstructions from other regions (PAGES 2k Consortium, 2013;
McGregor et al., 2015).
The comparison of these
first Antarctic 2k time series with those from other regions obtained within
the PAGES 2k working groups identified three specificities: (i) Antarctic
reconstructed centennial variations did not correlate with those from other
regions; (ii) the
Antarctic region was the only one where a protracted cold period was not
starting around 1580 CE; (iii) the Antarctic region was the only one where the
20th century was not the warmest century of the last 2000 years. A recent
effort
to characterize Antarctic
and sub-Antarctic climate variability during the last 200 years also concluded
that most of the trends observed since satellite climate monitoring began in
1979 CE cannot yet be distinguished from natural (unforced) climate variability
(Jones et al., 2016), and are of the opposite sign to those produced by most
forced climate model simulations over the same post-1979 CE interval. The only
exception to this conclusion was for changes in the Southern Annular Mode
(SAM), the leading mode of atmospheric circulation variability in the high
latitudes of the SH, which has showed a significant and unusual positive trend
since 1979 CE.
While changes in the SAM
have been related to the human influence on stratospheric ozone and greenhouse
gases (Thompson et al., 2011), major gaps remain in identifying the drivers of
multi-centennial Antarctic climate variability. For instance, the
influence of solar and
volcanic forcing on Antarctic climate variability remains unclear. This is due
to both the lack of observations and to the lack of confidence in climate model
skill for the Antarctic region (Flato et al., 2013). Goosse et al.
(2012) have used
simulations from an intermediate complexity model to attribute the Antarctic
annual mean cooling trend from 850 to 1850 CE to volcanic forcing. Recent
comparisons of climate model simulations with the PAGES2k regional reconstructions have
highlighted greater model-data disagreement in the Southern Hemisphere (SH)
than in the Northern Hemisphere (PAGES 2k–PMIP3 group, 2015; Abram et al 2016);
such disagreement could be due either to model deficiencies
or to large uncertainties
in the reconstructions which were built on relatively small number of records. Changes
in ocean heat content and ocean heat transport have likely contributed to the
different temperature evolution at high southern latitudes
compared to other regions
of the Earth (Goosse 2017), and model based studies have suggested that
circulation in the Southern Ocean may act to delay by centuries the development
of sustained warming trends in high southern latitudes (Armour et al.,
2016). Antarctic
temperature reconstructions spanning the last 2000 years may help to better
constrain the processes and timescales by which natural and anthropogenic
forcing act to affect climate changes in the Antarctic region.
This motivates our
efforts to produce updated Antarctic temperature reconstructions. The previous continent-scale reconstruction
(PAGES 2k Consortium, 2013), where only a limited number of records have been
used, may mask important regional-scale features of Antarctica’s climate
evolution. Here we use an expanded paleoclimate database of Antarctic ice core isotope
records and new reconstruction methodologies to reconstruct the climate of the
past 2000 years, at decadal scale and on a regional basis. Seven distinct
climatic regions have been selected: the Antarctic Peninsula, the West
Antarctic Ice Sheet, the East Antarctic Plateau, and four coastal domains of
East Antarctica. This regional selection, which is supported by regional atmospheric
RACMO2.4 model results, is applied to both Antarctic ice core-derived isotopic
(temperature-proxy) and snow accumulation rate reconstructions (see companion
paper in the same issue by Thomas et al.). Section 2 describes the ice core and
the temperature data sets used in this study, as well as the modelling
framework used to support the analysis. The climate
region definition, the
pre-processing of the data and the different reconstruction methods are
presented in Section 3. Section 4 discusses our new regional isotopic and
temperature reconstructions for Antarctica, including the application of the
previous
methodology to the new
database. Finally, section 5 presents the summary of our results and their
implications.
2 Datasets
2.1 Ice core
records
Here we present and use a
new expanded database which has been compiled in the framework of the PAGES
Antarctica 2k
working group. The
initial selection criteria are those requested by the PAGES 2k network (http://www.pages-igbp.org/ini/wg/2k-network/data) for the building of the community-sourced
database of temperature-sensitive proxy records (PAGES2k Consortium, revised
for Scientific Data). Briefly, i) the records must be publically available and
published, ii) a relation between the climate proxies and variables should be
stated, iii) the record duration should be between 300 and 2000 years, iv) the
chronology, certified by the data owner, should contain at least one
chronological control point near the end (most recent) part of the record and
another near the oldest part of the record, v) the resolution should be at
least one analysis every 50 years.
In building the
Antarctica2k database we also allow shorter records to be included, although
request a stratigraphic control using volcanic markers (Sigl et al., 2014) and
whenever possible, a dating by annual layer counted chronology. This last requirement
is only possible in the high-accumulation regions of West Antarctica, the
Antarctic Peninsula and coastal areas of East Antarctica. The inclusion of
shorter records is designed to improve data coverage for assessments of
climatic trends in Antarctica during the past century. The 11 records included
in the previous continental-scale reconstruction (PAGES 2k Consortium, 2013)
relied on a highly precise chronological framework consisting of a common
chronology, which used volcanic events to synchronize the records. Here, we use
both high and low-resolution records. Most of the records have a data resolution
ranging from 0.025 to 5 years (only three records have a resolution of >10
years). Previous studies (Frezzotti et al., 2007; Ekaykin et al., 2014) have
shown that post-depositional and wind scouring effects, acting more effectively
when the accumulation rate is very low, limit our ability to obtain temperature
reconstructions at annual resolution in most of the interior of Antarctica.
Because of this, in our regional reconstructions we use 5-year averaged data
for reconstructing the last 200 years. and 10-year averages for
reconstructing the last 2000 years. Using 5, or 10-year averages also decreases
our dependence on an annually precise chronological constraint between the ice
core records, allowing us to more confidently use the expanded database. The data have
been also screened for glaciological problems, with those records that are very
likely to be affected by ice flow dynamics excluded.
This enlarged database
consists of 112 isotopic records. A list of the records used are reported in
Table S1 (Supplementary Information) and their spatial distribution is shown in
Figure 1. Figure S1 shows the location of the ice core sites along with a
visualization of the
record lengths. Most of the records of this new database cover the last 200
years and this is particularly true for the more coastal areas. Within the
database, 36 records cover just the last 50 years or less, while 50 records cover
the
whole length of the past
200 years. There are 15 records that cover the last 1000 years, while only 9
records reach as far back as 0 CE.
2.2 Temperature
product
The instrumental record
is very short in Antarctica, and most ice core sites do not have weather
station measurements associated with the cores. In addition, the retrieval of
the first meter of firn can be difficult, due to poor cohesion of the snow.
As a result, for many
sites, there is no overlap between instrumental and proxy data, which
complicates the proxy calibration exercise. To enlarge the calibration dataset,
we use the climate field reconstruction from Nicolas and Bromwich (2014) (hereafter
NB2014). This surface temperature dataset provides homogeneous data at 60km
resolution, extends from 1957 to 2013, and includes the revised Byrd
temperature record (Bromwich et al., 2013) that improves the skill of the
temperature
product over West
Antarctica. It covers a longer timespan than reliable atmospheric reanalysis
products for Antarctica (which begin only 1979 CE), and has a higher spatial
resolution than available isotope enabled GCM outputs. This dataset is used to
estimate the spatial
representativeness of individual core sites, to scale the normalized isotopic
anomaly data to temperature, and to calculate the surface temperature
reconstructions with the Composite-Plus-Scale (CPS) method (Section 3.4.4).
2.3 Modelling
framework
In order to use model
information on isotope-temperature relationships in Antarctic precipitation, we
use a reference simulation performed using the Atmospheric General Circulation
Model ECHAM5-wiso. The initial ECHAM5 model (Roeckner et al.,
2003) has been equipped
with water stable isotopes (Werner et al., 2011), following earlier work on
ECHAM3 (Hoffmann et al., 1998) and ECHAM4 (Werner et al., 2001), and accounting
for fractionation processes during phase changes. This model
is used here because
recent studies, based on model-data comparisons using observations of
precipitation and surface vapour isotopic composition at a global scale and in
the Arctic (e.g. Werner et al, 2011; Steen-Larsen et al., 2017), have shown
strong
model skill of
ECHAM5-wiso when it is run in high resolution as in this study (T106, with a
mean horizontal grid resolution of approximately 1.1° x 1.1°). In Antarctica,
model performance was assessed against a compilation of surface data (Masson-Delmotte
et al., 2008) and recent measurements of vapour and precipitation (Goursaud et
al., in preparation; Ritter et al., 2016;Dittmann et al., 2016).
Here, we use a 1958-2014
CE simulation where ECHAM5-wiso was nudged to atmospheric reanalyses from ERA40
(Uppala et al., 2005) and ERA interim (Dee et al., 2011), and run using the
same ocean surface boundary conditions (SST and sea-ice)
as in ERA40 and ERA
interim. Ocean surface water isotopic values were set to constant values using
a compilation of observational data (Schmidt et al., 2007). Inter-comparisons
of reanalysis products showed good skills of ERA-interim for
Antarctic precipitation
(Wang et al., 2016), surface temperature, as well as vertical profiles of winds
and temperatures.
However, comparisons with
in-situ observations reveal an underestimate of precipitation and slight cold
bias in the surface temperatures in some regions (Thomas and Bracegirdle,
2015).
The ECHAM5-wiso
simulations produce a large increase in the temperature and the δ18O outputs prior to 1979, which is not observed
in instrumental or ice core data (Goursaud et al., 2017; Goursaud et al., in
prep.). This arises from a discontinuity in the ERA-40 reanalyses due
to the lack of observations available for assimilation and boundary conditions
prior to the satellite era (e.g. Antarctic sea ice) (Nicholas and Bromwich,
2014). We therefore use the ECHAM5-wiso simulations only for 1979-
2013 CE. For the analysis
of the isotope-temperature relationships at each individual ice core site, we
extracted the grid point data closest to each site. For the analysis of
isotope-relationships at regional scale, we calculated the area-weighted
average of model outputs at grid points within the region. The δ18O-temperature relationship was calculated
using the annual or seasonal average 2-meter temperature and annual
precipitation-weighted δ18O, to
mimic deposition processes. The simulation does not account for post-deposition
processes (i.e., diffusion, which is not important on the 5 and 10-year
timescales considered here; e.g. Küttel et al., 2012).
3 Methodology
3.1 Defining
climatic regions
Earlier work of the PAGES
Antarctica 2k working group produced a continent-scale temperature reconstruction
for the whole of Antarctica, as well as reconstructions for East and West
Antarctica based on a separation approximated by the Transantarctic
mountain chain (PAGES 2k
Consortium 2013). These broad-scale groupings mask important regional climatic
trends noted in individual studies. In particular, the absence of recent
significant warming in the Antarctica 2k continent-scale temperature reconstruction
is known to not be representative of all Antarctic locations (e.g. Steig et
al., 2009; Mulvaney et al., 2012; Abram et al., 2013; Steig et al 2013).
In this study we choose
seven climatic reconstruction regions (Figure 1). These regions are defined
based on our knowledge of regional climate and snow deposition processes in the
Antarctic region, as well as the availability of ice core isotope records.
The regional selections
were further validated and refined by spatial correlation of temperature using
the NB2014 data product.
The seven climatic
regions are defined as follows (see Table S1):
1. EAST ANTARCTIC
PLATEAU: All East Antarctic contiguous regions at an elevation higher than
2000m, including everything south of 85°S. We exclude high peaks of the
Transantarctic Mountains if they belong to the Victoria Land - Ross
Sea coast (e.g. Taylor
Dome or Hercules Névé).
2. WILKES LAND COAST: A
region that sits at an altitude <2000m, and extends from Lambert Glacier
(67°E) east to the start of Victoria Land and the Transantarctic Mountains
(160°E).
3. WEDDELL SEA COAST:
Extending eastward from longitude 60°W to 30°W, and south of 75°S, and lying at
an altitude <2000m. Eastward of the 30°W longitude, the 75°S latitude
defines the boundary with the Dronning Maud Land coast region,
with the northeastern
corner of the Weddell Sea coast region occurring where the 75°S latitude meets
the 2000m elevation contour. This region includes the Filchner Ice Shelf and
most of the Ronne Ice Shelf.
4. ANTARCTIC PENINSULA:
This region encompasses the mountainous Antarctic Peninsula. Between 74°S and
70°S the longitudinal boundaries lie between 60-80°W, while north of 70°S the
longitudinal boundaries increase to 50-80°W so as to capture the northern end
of the peninsula.
5. WEST ANTARCTIC ICE
SHEET: A region bounded by longitudes 60°W to 170°W, and north of 85°S. In the
Peninsula region (60-80°W) a northern bound of 74°S is also applied.
6. VICTORIA LAND - ROSS
SEA: This region is north of 85°S, and at an altitude <2000m, with the
exception of some localised peaks within the Trans-Antarctic mountain range. It
extends from 160°E to 190°E (i.e. 170°W) and incorporates most
of the Ross Ice Shelf.
7. DRONNING MAUD LAND
COAST: Extending eastward from 30°W to 67°E (Lambert glacier). The
southern-most boundary lies at 75°S (where this region borders with the Weddell
Sea region), or at the 2000-meter elevation contour elsewhere.
(To be continued)
Authors:
Barbara Stenni1,2, Mark
A. J. Curran3,4, Nerilie J. Abram5,6, Anais Orsi7, Sentia Goursaud7,8, Valerie
Masson-Delmotte7, Raphael
Neukom9, Hugues Goosse10, Dmitry Divine11,12, Tas van Ommen3,4, Eric J.
Steig13, Daniel A. Dixon14,
Elizabeth R. Thomas15, Nancy A. N. Bertler16,17, Elisabeth Isaksson11, Alexey Ekaykin18,19, Massimo
Frezzotti20, Martin Werner21
1Department of
Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca’ Foscari University of
Venice, Italy
2 Institute for the
Dynamics of Environmental Processes, CNR, Venice, Italy.
3 Australian
Antarctic Division, 203 Channel Highway, Kingston Tasmania 7050, Australia
4 Antarctic Climate
& Ecosystems Cooperative Research Centre, University of Tasmania, Hobart
7001, Australia
5 Research School of
Earth Sciences, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601, Australia.
6ARC Centre of Excellence
for Climate System Science, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 2601,
Australia
7 Laboratoire des
Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement (IPSL/CEA-CNRS-UVSQ UMR 8212), CEA
Saclay, 91191 Gif-sur-Yvette cédex, France
8 Université
Grenoble Alpes, Laboratoire de Glaciologie et Géophysique de l’Environnement (LGGE),
38041 Grenoble, France
9 University of
Bern, Oeschger Centre for Climate Change Research & Institute of Geography,
3012 Bern, Switzerland
10 Université
catholique de Louvain, Earth and Life Institute, Centre de recherches sur la
terre et le climat Georges Lemaître,
B-1348 Louvain-la-Neuve,
Belgium
11 Norwegian Polar
Institute, Fram centre, N-9296 Tromsø, Norway
12Department of
Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science, University of Tromsø - The
Arctic University of Norway, N-
9037, Norway
13 Department of
Earth and Space Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, USA
14 Climate Change
Institute, University of Maine, Orono, ME 04469, USA
15British Antarctic
Survey, Cambridge, UK CB3 0ET
16Antarctic Research
Centre, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington 6012, New Zealand
17National Ice Core
Research Facility, GNS Science, Gracefield 5040, New Zealand
18 Arctic and
Antarctic Research Institute, St Petersburg, Russia
19 Institute of
Earth Sciences, Saint Petersburg State University, St Petersburg, Russia
20 ENEA Casaccia,
Rome, Italy
21Alfred Wegner
Institute, Helmholtz Centre for Polar and Marine Research, 27570 Bremerhaven,
Germany

No comments:
Post a Comment