The establishment and survival of the State of Israel is due in a large measure to the gigantic financial assistant of the US that allowed the Jewish State to occupy and control directly or indirectly the whole of Palestinian territories and even the land of some of its neighbouring countries..
A
Conservative Estimate of Total U.S. Direct Aid to Israel: Almost $138 Billion
Shirl McArthur
The Washington
Report on Middle East Affairs’ current estimate of cumulative total U.S.
direct aid to Israel is
$137.638 billion, updating the estimate in the magazine’s Oct./Nov. 2013 issue.
It is an estimate because arriving at an exact amount is not possible, since
parts of U.S. aid to Israel are buried in the budgets of various U.S. agencies
or in a form not easily quantified, such as the early disbursement of aid,
giving Israel a direct benefit of interest income and the U.S. Treasury a
corresponding loss.
As a
conservative, defensible accounting of U.S. direct aid to Israel, this estimate
does not include the indirect benefits to Israel resulting from U.S. aid, nor
the substantial indirect or consequential cost to the U.S. as a result of its
blind support for Israel. Especially, this estimate does not include the costs
resulting from the invasion and occupation of Iraq—widely believed in the Arab
world, and by many non-Arabs as well, to have been undertaken for the benefit
of Israel.
Among the
real benefits to Israel that are not a direct cost to the U.S. taxpayer is the
provision allowing Israel to spend 26.3 percent of each year’s military aid
($815.3 million in FY ’15) in Israel. No other recipient of U.S. military aid
gets this benefit, which has resulted in an increasingly sophisticated Israeli
defense industry. As a result, the Stockholm International Peace Research
Institute reported that from 2010 to 2014 Israel was the 10th largest arms
exporter worldwide. Also, in contrast with other countries receiving military
aid, who must purchase through the Department of Defense (DOD), Israel deals
directly with U.S. companies, with no DOD review.
Israel also
benefits from “cash flow financing,” enabling it to finance multi-year purchases
through installment payments, scheduled over a longer time. Israel is using
cash flow financing to pay the reported $5.57 billion for the 33 advanced F-35
stealth aircraft scheduled to be delivered between now and 2021. As part of the
F-35 deal, the U.S. agreed to purchase about $4 billion worth of equipment from
Israeli defense companies.
Loan Guarantees

Another
benefit to Israel are the loan guarantees that the U.S. has extended to Israel
since 1972. While these have not yet been a cost to the U.S., they have enabled
Israel to borrow from commercial sources at more favorable terms and lower
interest rates, since the U.S. guarantees payment of the loans should Israel
default. To date, Israel has never defaulted on a U.S.-guaranteed loan.
The FY ’03
war supplemental appropriations act authorized $9 billion in loan guarantees
over three years. In FY ’05 these were extended until FY ’07, and in ’06 they
were extended again through FY ’11, with a “carryover” provision that Israel
may draw on unused U.S. guarantees through FY ’12. In 2012 Congress passed the
so-called “U.S.-Israel Enhanced Security Cooperation Act of 2012,” which
extended the loan guarantee authority until 2015.
The
Congressional Research Service (CRS) reported that $3.8 billion in loan
guarantee authority remains as of 2015. Israel has not borrowed any funds
against these guarantees since FY ’05. In 2012 Haaretz quoted an
Israeli official as saying “we consider the loan guarantees as preparation for
a rainy day…a safety net for war, natural disaster and economic crisis.”
In June
2013 Defense News reported that Israeli defense officials were considering
asking for $5 billion in new loan guarantees to cover the purchase of
additional military hardware, but there has been no further reporting about
this, so it may not be happening.
Subsidies
for Israel’s Colonists and Colonies
A real
benefit to Israel that is an unquantifiable cost to the U.S. taxpayer is the
private, tax-exempt money, probably hundreds of millions of dollars, that has
been collected by charitable U.S Jewish and Christian groups that then send the
money to support Israel’s colonists (“settlers”) and colony-related causes,
including groups designated by the U.S. as foreign terrorist organizations.
Since every
tax-exempt dollar that goes to the colonies represents a loss of,
conservatively, 20 cents to the U.S. Treasury, that means the U.S. taxpayer has
indirectly subsidized Israel’s colonies to the tune of tens of millions of
dollars, or more.
Sequestration
The FY ‘13
“sequestration” of funds for most government agencies and programs resulted in
a 7.8 percent reduction in DOD funds for Israel’s missile defense programs, and
a 5 percent reduction in all other accounts. The 2013 “Ryan-Murray Bipartisan
Budget Act” relaxed the sequestration budget cuts for FY ’14 and FY ’15. But
that expires at the end of this September. So, unless Congress acts by Oct. 1,
the start of FY ’16 (not a good bet with this incompetent Congress), the
sequestration cuts will kick back in.
Components
of Israel Aid
As with
previous Washington Report estimates of U.S. aid to Israel, this
update draws largely from CRS’ latest report on “U.S. Foreign Aid to Israel,”
which uses available and verifiable numbers, primarily from the appropriations
bills. Table 1 above is from an appendix to that report, plus amounts from the Washington
Report’s reporting and research, especially for the column showing
interest income to Israel resulting from the early disbursement of aid.
Not
counting the huge sums spent in Iraq—nor for the U.S. military intervention in
Afghanistan and the current operations in Iraq and Syria to combat ISIS—Israel
is the largest cumulative recipient of U.S. aid since World War II. The $3.7
billion or so that Israel receives each year from the U.S. amounts to about
$450 per Israeli, including its non-Jewish citizens. The largest amounts have
been for military grants (FMF) and economic grants (Economic Support Funds,
ESF).
In August
2007 the U.S. and Israel agreed on a new, 10-year, $30 billion aid plan,
beginning in FY ’09 and calling for no ESF and incremental annual increases in
FMF, reaching $3.1 billion by FY ’13 and remaining at that level through FY
’18. There are several reports of U.S.-Israeli discussions about a new,
multi-year agreement continuing military aid beyond 2018. Reports of the amount
being discussed range between $3.5 billion and $4.5 billion per year.
Israel is
the largest recipient of U.S. FMF funds. The president’s FY ’16 request for
Israel of $3.1 billion would amount to about 53 percent of total FMF funding
worldwide, and would represent about 20 percent of Israel’s overall defense
budget.
A major
part of U.S. support for Israel’s defense program is the deployment to Israel
in 2008 of the X-Band radar system to detect incoming missiles. Since this
system is U.S.-owned and operated (meaning the constant presence on Israeli
soil of U.S. troops and defense contractors), its considerable costs are not
reflected in these numbers.
Another
element of U.S. support for Israel’s defense program is the emergency U.S.
stockpile in Israel. Since the 1980s the U.S. has stored military equipment and
munitions in Israel for possible use by the U.S. and, with Washington’s
permission, by Israel. The stockpile consists of missiles, armored vehicles and
artillery ammunition. Officially the equipment belongs to the U.S. military, so
its value is also not included in Table 1. During Israel’s 2006 war against
Hezbollah the U.S. gave Israel access to the stockpile, and during Israel’s
2014 assault against Gaza the Defense Department allowed Israel to withdraw 120
mm tank rounds and 40 mm illumination rounds. The authorized value of material
stored in Israel started at $100 million, but has been raised in increments and
now stands at $1.8 billion. Most recently the 2014 “U.S.-Israel Strategic
Partnership Act” authorized an additional $200 million for each of FY ’14 and ’15.
“Migration
and refugee assistance” is another part of U.S. aid to Israel. This originally
was intended to help Israel absorb Jewish refugees from the Soviet Union, but
was expanded in 1985 to include “refugees resettling in Israel.” However, since
Israel doesn’t differentiate between refugees and other immigrants, this money
subsidizes all immigrants to Israel.
Israel also
regularly receives grants from the “American Schools and Hospitals Abroad”
(ASHA) program. According to USAID, Israeli institutions have received the most
ASHA funding in the Middle East.
A
significant amount of aid to Israel comes from the DOD budget for “joint
defense projects.” Beginning in 2011 the U.S. significantly increased the
amounts granted to help support Israel’s multi-level missile defense programs,
reaching $729 million in FY ’14 and $620 million in FY ’15. This reporter’s
previous estimates identified about $9.295 billion to Israel from the DOD
budget through FY ’13, which was reduced by about $32 million with the FY ’13
sequestration. To that has been added amounts for FY ’14 and ’15, as shown in
Table 1.
Table 1
also shows the Washington Report’s conservative estimate of Israel’s
interest income resulting from the early disbursement of aid. Assuming that
Israel’s aid money is drawn down over the course of each year, a 1 percent
interest rate is applied to one-half of the aid for FY ’10 through ’15.
The “All
Other” column on Table 1 reflects information from the CRS report, plus this
magazine’s reporting and research, giving amounts from other U.S. departments
and agencies. The two largest U.S.-Israeli scientific organizations are the
BIRD Foundation (research and development) and the BARD Fund (agricultural
research). The latter receives about $500,000 a year from the Agriculture
Department. In addition, in each of FY ’09, ’10 and ’12 through ‘15 Congress
appropriated $2 million from the Energy Department for the U.S.-Israeli Energy
Cooperation Program. In FY ’11 $300,000 was appropriated. In FY ’10 the Energy
Department contributed $3.3 million to the BIRD Foundation for clean energy
projects.
For those
who wish to look up more details, Table 2 above gives citations for the foreign
aid and DOD appropriations bills for the past five years.
Shirl
McArthur is a retired U.S. foreign service officer based in the Washington, DC area.
Reference:
https://www.wrmea.org/015-october/a-conservative-estimate-of-total-u.s.-direct-aid-to-israel-almost-$138-billion.html
Reference:
https://www.wrmea.org/015-october/a-conservative-estimate-of-total-u.s.-direct-aid-to-israel-almost-$138-billion.html

No comments:
Post a Comment